All for Joomla All for Webmasters
Criteria & Process

Eligibility - Chiba Principles

Criteria for Recognition by the APQR – Chiba Principles

A modified set of 11 criteria that takes into account the APQN membership criteria as well as Chiba Principles are:

Criterion Description
1. Organization Category The QAA is a full member of APQN or is a QA body which is valid entity recognized by the appropriate authority in the relevant country/territory/region, and is accountable to stakeholders.
2.Operations The quality assurance agency undertakes quality assurance activities (at institutional and/or program level) on a cyclical basis.
3. Mission and Objectives The mission statement and objectives of the agency are understood consistently by its stakeholders.
4. Staff and Reviewers The profile of the agency staff and the profile of the reviewers the agency uses are consistent with the Mission Statement.
5. Independence The quality assurance agency is independent and has autonomous responsibility for its QA operations. The judgments and recommendations of the agency’s reports cannot be changed by third parties.
6. Resources The agency has sufficient resources to run its operations in accordance with its mission statement and objectives.
7. Process and Criteria The description of the processes and criteria applied by the agency are transparent and publicly available and normally include: selfevaluation, site visit, public report and followup measure. The published standards and criteria are applied consistently and rigorously.
8. Appeals An appeals mechanism is available for the institutions.
9. Quality Assurance The agency has effective quality assurance measures in place to monitor itself and is subject to occasional review.
10. Monitoring and Evaluation The agency undertakes research on internal and external quality assurance and provides information and advice to higher education institutions.
11. Agency Linkages The agency cooperates and collaborates with other agencies and key players across national borders.

Recognition by or inclusion onto APQR is based on a review of the agency against its adherence to compliance with the above criteria.

Acceptance onto APQR requires “substantial compliance” with these criteria. Each criterion will be judged “fully, substantially, partially or non‐compliant”; and substantial compliance with the whole set needs full or substantial compliance with each criterion.

Inclusion onto APQR will be valid for a period of five years. The governing body of APQR has the right to cancel the inclusion on APQR if there are circumstances and evidence that call into question the substantial compliance of the agency with the review criteria.

The logo of APQN Quality Label is as follows:

logo

News and Updates

  • APQR Established +

    Dissolving Boundaries For A Quality Region The AGM of the Asia Pacific Quality Network (APQN) has endorsed a proposal for Read More
  • Bengaluru Statement 2016 on Next-Generation Quality Assurance +

    Bengaluru Statement 2016 on Next-Generation Quality Assurance of Higher Education:A shared vision and commitment for fostering partnership beyond borders Global Read More
  • Bangalore Global Summit +

    Bengaluru Statement  2016 on Next - Generation Quality Assurance of Higher Education calls upon QA organisations to join hands as Global Read More
  • APQR Inaugural review completed in Fiji +

    The inaugural review for apqr has been successfully completed in fiji. Please click here to download the report. Read More
  • Asia Pacific Quality Register (APQR) Council approved inclusion of Russian Register on APQR +

    Dear APQN Members and Stakeholders, APQR and APQN are pleased to inform that Certification Association “Russian Register” (RR) based in Read More
  • NCPA , Russia included on APQR +

  • 1

apqr

Dissolving Boundaries For A Quality Region

The AGM of the Asia Pacific Quality Network (APQN) has endorsed a proposal for the establishment of the Asia-Pacific Quality Register (APQR) as part of its Decennial agenda in 2012. APQR would be a register of external quality assurance agencies (QAAs) that demonstrated certain thresholds of maturity. An independent external review by peers would be the backbone of the APQR.

APQR came into effect from January 2015, and the first meeting of APQR Council was held in Kunming, China during 17‐19 April, 2015. The first formal review for the APQR was conducted for the Fiji Higher Education Commission (FHEC) in Suva during 24-26 June, 2015.

APQR